[Arthur]

nbkTHEGENERAL;16701 wrote:

i liked it until i beat it you had to tie so much shit together to get the ending it was easy as hell too. The thing i liked about the story line was that the people(i think)and events were real but the deaths were not(obviously tho)so i liked the fact that i was unaware of the history lesson i recieved. I did like the fact that they left the story wide open for a sequel BUT i hate the way the story ufolded so early. Alot of shit was obvious how you would eventually fidn out everyone who died had a good cause and you were the wrong oen some calssic shakespere stuff. So after the first two assassinations you could tell the moral and outcome of the story

my issue was how obvious the story had began to look after some missions i guess all in all i agree with you besides ol’ dude dying. Im glad he stayed alive and he ending could have went either way could lead to a prequel, which everyone is doing these days

but thats just my input

glad u took the time to actually give an opinion and make some nice points

i do agree with it being tooooo easy, it seemed like the bosses didn’t get harder as the game went on, like once u had mastered the fighting, the game was just walkable with ease

and yeah your right, i saw the whole masyaf being the real bad guy coming from defeating like the first 3 bosses, if u wanna call them that lol

but at the same time i was thinking “nah surely they didn’t make it that obvious”

and i was a little let down at the end when all was revealed and i was right all along as i’m sure pretty much everyone who played the game was

but i still stand by the fact that dude was just supposed to die in that game, it was set out for it :^: