[contagion]

@Tyler Durden 4486 wrote:

1.There are more sites then that, and proof? Do you have proof that the sites don’t accept bribes? No. It’s called making an educated guess, you just look at the trends when it comes to ratings. Especially franchises where little changes over the course of the games but they consistently get high ratings despite that and bitch about minor things in some games that exist in other ones but they aren’t brought up. You presume 5 to be. You have proof? No it’s called reasonable doubt.
2.Many times reviews are correct, many times they arent. Why would you even cite as oh it’s popular and other people agree? That doesn’t mean crap, because the halo games consistently get good ratings and they bore the hell out of me. Taste is to the individual, the majority could think any number of things. Doesnt make a good any more or less entertaining untill you come up with your own assumption.
3.I call everyone kid, kid. You’re more then likely older then me and I say don’t follow the sheep because what does bringing up reviews add to an arguement? Everyone looks for different things in games and when I talked about oblivion I never once brought up reviews because they are insignificant.
4.I said ghost recon, not ghost recon 2. I havent played ghost recon 2, you’re the one who when I stated I think bioshock’s overrated got his feelings hurt and tried to ask whether I’ve done this and that and tried to correct me on the number of endings and there are 3 not 2. Why’d I bring up what I did? They have nothing in common but it’s the same train of thought by saying a large number of people adhere to one idea so that means it must be right or more valid because you disagree with the majority. What I said was everybody in the world could climax while playing that game and give it game of a lifetime what does that even mean if people are not into that style of gameplay? Or if the game doesn’t appeal to them? That a large number of review sites are right and they’re wrong? Bs, the zeldia franchise is grossly overrated and I can’t stand that series. I still overall said it was a good game. Game of the year? No, best of all time? Hell no. It has it’s fair share of flaws and I recognized that. Whereas you had to try to pick apart my reasons for saying the game wasn’t all that when Im entitled to my opinion on the game. I wouldn’t have said crap to you untill you tried to make assumptions about me.

Am I getting mad? No, because I really don’t care. I insult everyone so don’t feel special. Evaluate yourself for picking apart my reasons for not being into an overrated game in the first place when I still said it was good, kid.

Very ironic post for someone who spoke on me jumping to conclusions. The only people who think r6 is better then gow suck at the game? Or wait what about people who don’t like Halo? You do this even more then I do kid. Then you say anyone who doubts you on bioshock to go read the reviews and see whose opinion they are closer to? Lol, you’re funny. That’s putting emphasis on reviews right there not just using it as a point of reference. How a game will be remembered? Or how much a game sells? Pathetic.

1. More sites than that? Oh really. List off the major reviewers : EGM, GI, IGN, Gamespot, Gamepro. That’s five. I could see a company possibly paying off a reviewer that somebody who isn’t more than a casual gamer would read, but all the insignificant ones too? Please. Another assumption. And are they just paid off because you disagree with them? Or is it just an assumption, like your so called “Reasonable doubt” being actually an assumption considering other than judging by review scores written and given by people who surely play games much more than you or I that you disagree with, AKA you have a differing opinion, you say THEY MUST BE PAID OFF REASONABLE DOUBT LOL KIDZ LOL
2. You should rephrase that to “Many times reviews are correct imo and many times they aren’t imo.” because a review is neither right nor wrong, it’s simply the opinion of someone whose PAID to have their opinion told to the masses and to judge and seperate the supposed good from bad games. Are these people paid for their job for no reason? Were they picked from hats? Or are they knowledgeable professionals with more insight into gaming and the industry itself than you or I could ever have?
3. The idea of majority rule is behind the concept of democracy. Why do we vote? How do we elect the leader of our country? How do we pass laws to govern our country? How do things get passed in the UN? By a majority opinion agreeing. Why do games sell more than others? Because a majority finds them better. Why cite reviews at all? Because when a majority of the gaming industry whom are all professionals are agreeing, 9/10 times they’ve got it right. Sure, some guys get good scores that aren’t as good as their score may tell, but that’s all in the eyes of the player. I’m simply saying my opinion is the majority opinion, that’s all there is to it and because you’re in the minority of opinions there’s no reason to be upset, remember, be a leader not a follower.
4. Wrong, there’s 2 endings. Look it up. There was originally going to be 3, but due to the developers having to censor the 3rd they cut it from the game. There was a clip of it in the PC files of the game but it remains unused regardless of what you do and there might be a clip of it on youtube as well. It was supposed to be having to do with after you save the LS and meet them you start killing them. I made no assumption, I said “MAYBE” as in perhaps you did this. I didn’t say “HEY THIS WHAT YOU DID, END OF STORY”. I made no assumptions about the way you played the game at all. And you still have yet to address your reaching to save yourself with bringing up racist thought patterns and lame cheesy stereotypical sayings that you’d hear in middle school or maybe early high school. And thanks for assuming my feelings got hurt but then, that’s all you have to run off, assumptions. You assume people pay off review sites and since you supposedly are such a leader and don’t care about them, I don’t know why you’d even state that or know that. Then you assume you know me or how I feel. Interesting behaviors from somebody whose declaring that they wouldn’t have said crap until I made assumptions. I guess you can’t handle them when said to you but whenever you think them to be in your best interest they’re the only things out of your mouth. Btw, naming yourself Tyler Durden online is not very leader-like behavior, try not to be such a follower alright? There’s only like 6 million other people with that name. If you’ve read the book Fight Club, you’ll read in the beginning where the author wrote the intro about the millions of people influenced by that book and the millions who copy from it. Remember, “sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken.”
And you cared enough to write a few massive responses and you know what psychiatry says about people who insult everyone, right?

I did it twice and I wasn’t being serious, I was playing around and making broad generalizations. I’m well aware that not everyone who dislikes GoW or Halo sucks at the games or doesn’t have a 360. But unlike you, I wasn’t being serious when I said those things. I referred to the review scores because once more it’s a compilation of opinions averaged together to give a general idea as to how the game is. If you can’t handle being in the minority of the opinion, don’t make excuses. And having a differing opinion from the majority doesn’t make you unique so please get out of that high school mentality which I imagine must be difficult when that’s where you’ll be going tomorrow.