@Tyler Durden 4378 wrote:
1.You climax over the game doesnt mean I do.
2.Did explore, still not that expansive as you’re trying to make it sound.
3.Do i really care about reviews? Thats a bunch of game publishers many of which are paid off’s opinion. Not mine.
4.Halo is overrated as hell. You’ve played any halfway decent fps you’ve played halo.
5.The game reviews are closer to your opinion know what that means? You’re a lame ass cat who follows the sheep. Well gee everyone gives it good reviews! Guess that means I need to. It’s a 8.5 game, not no game to end all games. System shock 2 was a better game then bioshock. Stop crying already because i insult the game.
6.As for saying oblivion’s combat engine sucks, you can do more in there then bioshock and theres more to do then there is in bioshock. A larger mission variety as well, for instance. One mission you’re part of a contest, where you must stay a night in a mansion with a group of people. You are there to assassinate them but there’s multiple ways you can do it. Just run through and kill them, get them to go off by theirselves then kill them one by one or turn them against one another. Even the melee weapons have depth, since the more you level in melee the more attacks you gain such as a backhand stroke,lunging stroke,shield bash, sideways swipes that can disarm opponents. The arrows have realistic physics, and there is more magic then there are plasmids in this game. Oblivion lasts longer, has way more you can do and you can actually create your character. Plus the worlds much longer. But thats your opinion it sucks, doesnt make it fact. Just like its my opinion bioshock sucks. You tell people to look at biased reviews for games then you are not a real gamer.
1. You climax over Oblivion doesn’t mean I do.
2. I guess everyones wrong and you’re right, it’s 8.5, every single review site was paid off, does that include this one? I can’t believe that anyone could be so dense and biased as to suggest that because their opinion doesn’t coincide with the majority of reviews that over 50 review sites were all paid off and are all biased.
3. Actually, they’re game reviewers, not publishers. Secondly, you honestly think all the LITTLE sites were paid off? Maybe I could understand saying EGM, GI, or IGN. But if you honestly think that over 50 reviewers were all paid off, then you’re wrong. You just don’t like that the majority of gaming sites and gamers agree with me and not you. No need to make excuses for your opinion being a minority. I don’t make excuses for my opinion on Oblivion being a minority, I don’t say DURR THEY’RE ALL BIASED, I just simply state my personal belief with the knowledge that some people enjoy that game and I’m not one of them.
4. Point?
5. ROFL. Yeah because I agree with reviews based on my own experience with a video game I follow the sheep. I could go ahead and say “WELL OBLIVION GOT GOOD REVIEWS AND YOU’RE JUST FOLLOWING THE SHEEP!” but I’m not so retarded as to make sweeping generalizations that categorize everyone whose opinion happens to coincide with a reviews “a sheep follower”. Bioshock is a 9.5 game and the best single player game on 360.
6. You’re right, my opinion is that Oblivion sucks and you standing up for it will not change it. I played and formed my own opinion based on that experience and if I just enjoyed games based on good reviews, I’d have enjoyed Oblivion. And if you really think that every single review site in existence that reviewed Bioshock was biased then the only biased reviewer is you. I’m not biased for or against any game or system and I judge games based on playing them, not reading about them. I pointed to reviews because, you know, it just seems unlikely that the entire gaming populace is wrong and you’re right. You’re entitled to your own opinion though and I’m well aware that mine won’t change it and that’s okay because yours won’t change mine.